In its antitrust confrontation with the federal government, the pillar of Google’s protection has been that innovation — not restrictive contracts, backed by billions in funds to trade companions — explains its success as the large of web search.
Its aggressive benefit, it says, is sensible folks, working tirelessly to enhance its merchandise.
Pandu Nayak, Google’s first witness within the antitrust trial that started final month, is the face of that protection.
Mr. Nayak, a vp of search, was raised in India and graduated on the high of his class at certainly one of that nation’s elite technical faculties. He got here to America, earned his Ph.D. in pc science at Stanford College after which spent seven years as a analysis scientist on synthetic intelligence initiatives at NASA’s Ames Analysis Heart in Silicon Valley.
Nineteen years in the past, Mr. Nayak joined Google and located a very welcoming office, full of skilled mates. “On the finish of the day, Google is a expertise firm — it actually values the talents that I’ve,” Mr. Nayak stated in his testimony on Wednesday.
The pc scientist’s testimony is an try to rebut a central argument within the case filed by the Justice Division and 38 states and territories. Their go well with claims that scale is important to competitors in search. That’s, the extra knowledge from person queries a search engine collects, the extra it learns to enhance its service, which attracts nonetheless extra customers, advertisers and advert income. That flywheel, the go well with says, is fueled by ever-increasing volumes of person knowledge.
We’re confirming your entry to this text, it will take only a second. Nevertheless, if you’re utilizing Reader mode please log in, subscribe, or exit Reader mode since we’re unable to confirm entry in that state.